"Rough Voyage to Azatlan!"
So the thing is, I was starting to have almost a parasocial relationship with Vic Lockman. Yeah, I'm hard on him a lot of the time, but reading a lot of his sixties stories, I was thinking, hey, wow, a lot of these are not bad--way to go, Vic! It was just a kind of fun thing to explore. I mean yes sure I knew he was a fundamentalist Christian, with the regressive view that go along with that, but hey, ain't that America? I was still enjoy celebrating his successes.
Look, I know I said I didn't want to be overtly political here, but in this case I find politics kind of thrust upon me. I recently discovered something about Lockman. This isn't a big secret or anything; the only reason it's not more common knowledge is that nobody really cares about him. But: he wasn't just a generic conservative Christian, as I thought, but almost certainly an actual factual member of the John Birch Society. Read this hair-curlingly racist pro-Apartheid tract from 1985, originally published in a neo-nazi-adjacent newsletter--or actually, don't, that would be a better idea if you don't need to see to believe--but there it is. If you know anything about the tenets of Bircherism, this will look extremely familiar, but if you think I'm overextrapolating in making the connection, also note that he wrote this 1972 comic (not available online, but if you know you know) promoting Gary Allen's None Dare Call It Conspiracy, a central Bircher text and the foundation for the beliefs of people like Alex Jones. You're not promoting that shit if you're not a truly toxic human being.
(I'm not gonna lie, I do really like this self-portrait of him as a spider from his website. It makes him seem kind of adorable.)
Now, in a sense none of this matters; it's not like my posts have been glorifying Lockman personally, and you can still critically analyze the works of bad people. In fact, it could be a good thing, inasmuch as I now have a new critical lens to view his work, theoretically complicating it in an interesting way. But, as I said, I was really getting into him, so it's hard not to irrationally view this as a betrayal. And, you know, there's no avoiding it: no matter what I want to do, his work's going to strikes me differently now. If I'm being honest, I kinda half-wish I'd never learned this. But I did, so what can you do? I briefly thought, well, maybe I can just pretend I don't know it. It's not like anyone's likely to look it up and bring it to my attention, and if they do I can just feign shock then. But man, I just can't be that dishonest. You've gotta take a person you're engaging with critically as they are. So I suppose what I'll do right now is write about this Lockman story and see how the experience strikes me.
I was actually planning on writing about this story last week, immediately after that "Conquistador" business, but then I learned what I learned and it threw me for a loop, so I punted with some Barks while deciding what to do. Because, true fact, this story actually surprised me. It turned out to be way more of a roller coaster ride than I possibly could have expected. So, here we go.
Read more »Labels: Tony Strobl, Vic Lockman












