Look, I know you wanted something for Halloween, but all I have is this half-started entry I'd had sitting around for a while. Gasp at its spookiness:
Is this blog going to consist exclusively from now on of obscure stories I remember with unearned fondness from my childhood? Maybe. Or maybe I just need to decompress as I and everyone else wait for the end of the world. Blah.
Anyway, I think we see the hilarious misunderstanding we've got going on here. As far as Donald's psychologizing there goes, that might apply to other rich people, but they know their uncle personally, yeah? So this "he needs a break from his mansions and yachts" thing is...silly, yeah? I know this isn't the first time I've noted that Western writers often had very vague and inconsistent ideas of who Scrooge was supposed to be. Note also: "billionaire."
In defense of this nonsense, reading this story WAS, in fact, my first encounter with the word "scone." But I was six-ish at the time, is the thing. Were they really a strange, exotic thing in the fifties, or is our writer just being silly? I strongly suspect the latter.
Okay, so let me drop some knowledge on you: if you damage someone else's property, that person is not allowed to just holler a random amount of money at you and then, I guess, murder you if you don't pay it. All of this would be adjudicated by courts and insurance agencies. The fact that Scrooge is going along with this nonsense as opposed to calling the cops on this clearly unhinged individual threatening to inflict grievous bodily harm on his nephew does not speak highly of him.
That aside, there are a lot of these stories with the "I don't want to do a thing but oh no now suddenly I badly need the money you were offering so I guess I have no choice" thing going on. But it always bugs me that they can't ever even be a tiny bit subtle about it: oh, what a coincidence, it just happens to be exactly the amount of money offered. It's going to look contrived in any case, but would it kill you to at least vary the number a bit--he demands eighteen hundred dollars instead of two thousand, say--to at least create a veneer of...what, gravitas? What am I asking for here?
Anyway, we lurch from that to this. Face the wrath of Bo and Some Other Guy! Can you impale boats with a periscope like that? I am skeptical. But anyway, typical Most Generic Villains Ever.
This is the cunning plan, and by Disney Comics rules, it's actually kind of reasonable. Of course, when you think about it even a bit, the most cursory amount of investigation would reveal that Donald being involved wouldn't be plausible. It's like those Ace Attorney cases where oh no, an innocent person is being blamed, and for some reason it's not incumbent on the prosecutors to supply any sort of motive, the way you have to for the real killer. Grr! So unfair! Blah.
Also, because it's funny, I want us to be aware of the interior decoration in this sub, which appears to consist solely of a lumpy mattress, gold bullion (that's either left in an open vault or just stacked in piles, depending where you're looking) and at least one unsecured missile just kind of rolling around. All this is fairly insane.
Ah yes, the kind of pluck we know and love. I'd like to know who these "friends" are that Donald is wailing about. Best be more concerned with your imminent demise than your posthumous reputation.
Also, dammit, who even ARE these ships you're attacking? Actual naval vessels, or just random freelance gold shippers? No good thinking about THIS nonsense.
I actually feel like there's something potentially interesting in the "how could he! Wait, he couldn't've. But he must've!" dynamic. Here it doesn't go beyond Scrooge just assuming, well, the impossible thing must be true," but there's still potential. It really is an interesting and unanswerable question: what would Disney comics (and Warner Bros, Walter Lantz, etc) have been like with quality control?
And then...yeah. There's this. Donald knows fluent morse code because OF COURSE he does. Learned it in the Little Booneheads, probably. That is some kind of exactitude. How does he get those exact coordinates? Best not to ask. Actually, we'll come back to this part soon.
Also, not-Bo is Mo. Make a note of it. Side question: would it have killed these writers to come up with somewhat distinctive villains? I can't blame anyone too much; even Barks relied a lot on generic pig-faces, but come on. I am SO not vibing on Bo and Mo.
My feeling is that this Would Not Work, but who can say? I'm not sure if it was ever tested on Mythbusters.
I do appreciate how extremely chill the cops (military?) are in this world. You want to just take this sub, which presumably still contains missiles and probably relevant evidence against these two, who still have to go to trial you know!, like that. Sure, just take it. Return it any ol' time; you know where. "The Harbor Authorities." That is some real professional malfeasance on the part of the cop (army guy?).
"Hootmon Inn" is very slightly amusing. That is all, and DANG is it conveniently located for the passing submarine trade. I feel like we're probably supposed to take her assertion that her scones are the best at face value, but come on. Every little shop like this, especially when catering to foreigners, is going to play the authenticity and greatness of their food all the way up.
Anyway, they end up doing the classic "doing dishes to pay when short of funds" thing, and...
Right. Okay. This is really the only reason to say anything about this story. I know I and others have remarked in the past about the somewhat disorienting tendency some old writers had to suddenly ascribe a wildly idiosyncratic trait to a character. Well, if "Donald has an eidetic memory" isn't at the top of that heap, it's certainly making a good run for it. Although at least this does explain some things about the morse code episode: it presumably would have been easy for him to memorize the morse alphabet (though he still would've needed practice to be able to use it fluently), and if, I don't know, the bandits had had the coordinates of the attack on a blackboard (I wanted to say white board, but this is the fifties), fair enough, I guess. Do I think our writer was making any conscious effort to associate the morse thing and the memory thing? I do not. Still, there you go. Have fun.
Well what can you do. This was a good use of everyone's time. I do quite enjoy the nephew wailing there in the bottom right, a veritable Greek chorus to this tragedy.
I know sometimes it seems like low-hanging fruit, but we MUST unpack this. Scrooge can't go to Scotland because, apparently, all his "business interests" are stateside, so what can you do? Probably just another misjudgment of the kind of character Scrooge is, but, well...also, I feel like an idiot even suggesting this, but if Donald is capable of perfectly replicating the elite Scottish scones, doesn't it seem conceivable that Scrooge could've just found a recipe?
"Well, no, Scrooge couldn't go himself and he couldn't trust anyone but his nephews," you may well say. Right, I know that's often the rationale for bringing them along, but if this all has to be that sub rosa, I don't know if he would've been standing on a random bridge hollering about his woes.
Something seems off about the logic here, but never mind. I do like that we come to some degree of accord, with Donald more or less on top. I guess. Well, look, ultimately, this story is of no account and is not spooky in the slightest, but HAPPY HALLOWEEN!!!
Do you know, I actually have some childhood fondness for that one too! I read it in the French translation, of course, and it had actually managed to replicate the scone/stone pun by translating "scone" as "galettes" (a sort of generic term for flatbread, tarts, pancakes, etc. of various kinds) and having it be misheard as "galets" (pebbles).
ReplyDeleteIncidentally, on the topic of Donald knowing morse code: could it be that the writer assumed Donald was an actual ex-sailor, and knowing morse code counted as general Sailor Skills(TM)? Note that the navy officer guy seems just as able of decoding his winks on the fly.
ReplyDeleteThat's a good point. There are definitely things like that that I could be missing.
DeleteI like these old Tony Strobl stories. True, they're often not very good narratively, but there are dozens of Italian stories with even worse logic that end up in deluxe hardcover collections.
ReplyDeletePerhaps I am being unfair there.
ReplyDeleteI think it's fair. The only thing I'll note is that those Italian stories DO at least tend to LOOK a lot better.
DeleteA Halloween post that is NOT about a Halloween story? Now that's spooky! You sure know how to scare the socks off people, Geox!
ReplyDeleteI grew up without Tony Strobl (since we got so little of him in Poland), and looking at his work now, it does feel a bit cheap/weak, ESPECIALY compared to Barks. For years, I read that he introduced the idea of how Scrooge earn his number one dime by shoeshining (and even Rosa referenced his story), so when it was FINALLY published in Poland this year, I was a bit disappointed by how little to it there was, but it was all about that single panel flashback people bring up over and over, so maybe I don't know what I expected.
Still, I understand that many people have nostalgia for him, and I get it. It’s just that when looking at his work now, it feels "meh" compared to others.
I find HD&L’s expressions funny for some reason in the final panel.
Oh, well. I’m going to ponder now on who Geox is voting for. Such a hard guess and a real brainteaser…
I will agree that some of the older artists are a bit lackluster compared to the artists who came along during what could be called “The Carl Barks Revival” period that brought us Daan Jippes, Vicar, Daniel Branca, Don Rosa, William Van Horn, Pat Block and others I’m surely forgetting. But Tony Strobl is a bit of nostalgia for those of us who remember his work. During the Whitman era, even a mediocre to lousy Strobl story felt like less of a disappointment than the Daisy and Donald or Uncle Scrooge issues that Western’s artists were cranking out then. Many of them were lifeless stories that looked like they collared a coloring book artist to draw them.
DeleteI'm trying to understand the reason for Donald having previously unmentioned eigetic memory for that one panel. The writer did want to depict Donald as a honest person who won't deliberately steal someone's secrets, and this was the fastest method for him to get the receipt anyway? That must be it. But then he goes and uses that information he shouldn't have had (in his own opinion) to get money? Maybe only ever having Scrooge as a costumer is squaring that circle?
ReplyDeleteHere Scrooge is actually showing some reservation and calculating the cost of him leaving his businesses to go satisfy his urges. Maybe if he could have convinced himself that he will get... let's say a thousand bucks from the trip he would be already on that "adventure", getting those scones himself, never mind his businesses.
Maybe only ever having Scrooge as a costumer is squaring that circle?
DeleteI think that's supposed to be it, but it's interesting: I didn't touch on this in the entry (I should've), but the writer seems to be having this internal debate that remains implicit in the story itself about whether what Donald is doing is ethical. But then he just kind of abandons it.
@Debbie Anne: Yeah, Strobl wasn't one of the greats, but he was at least characteristic, and that counts for a lot. I do think Strobl's quality was very dependent on who he got to ink him — Steve Steere was always very stiff, for example. This story is definitely one of his better efforts, would say.
ReplyDelete(Personally, of the vintage American Duck artists, and discounting Taliaferro, I still think Al Hubbard was the only one besides Barks whom I would put on a level with yer Daan Jippes, Marco Rota and so on. But I know GeoX isn't very hot on him. Ts ts, and he's got such good taste otherwise.)
Hey, I don't dislike Hubbard; I just think his ducks are a little weird-looking. His Scamp stories look good, even if the writing tends to be pretty dire.
DeleteI find Hubbard's ducks off-putting as well, but I do love his Tabby. The expressions on that cat in "Out of the Depths Despair" alone...!
DeleteFWIW, my guess--completely unsubstantiated by facts--is that scones *were* unknown to the average American in the 50's, who would have been unfamiliar with anything not sold in American grocery stores. Where would they have heard about scones, if they didn't know any Brits or read British lit? It's not like there were food-focused shows on TV. Didn't Julia Child really start serious food TV in the 1960's?
ReplyDeleteAre you going to review DuckTales #1 from Dynamite? It's at least not a Marvel tie in.
ReplyDeleteMight be better to wait on reviewing Dynamite DuckTales until the four-issue opening story is complete. Issue #1 seems to be sort of a prologue to introduce the Scrooge character to readers unfamiliar with him. Next issue has Magica, so presumably something will actually *happen*.
DeleteI chose the cover focusing on The Dime in Scrooge's hands, though, and it does make me happy to have an issue #1 of a comics series featuring Old Number One! The only thing that has made me happy in this dire week....
All I can say after reading the first 4 pages put online is that it felt to target younger readers then usual, especialy that HD&L felt to act like they "new" to the concept of "what" Uncel Scrooge is...
DeleteYes, here’s my marketing guess: they figure they are marketing these comics to parents of comics-reading-age children, parents who themselves watched the original DuckTales as kids and remember it with great fondness. But in that case the children who will read the comics may not know who Scrooge is and may need this introduction. HDL in this case are aligned with the child-reader in their relative ignorance!
DeleteThat was a...prescient comment about the world ending.
ReplyDeletehoping that you continue putting out more life anecdotes and duck reviews!
Ho ho ho. I laugh so as not to scream. But yeah, expect more stuff relatively soon.
DeleteWell hey, even Barks Scrooge got sick of being rich sometimes -- cf. "Tralla La"
ReplyDeleteHaving read that first issue: yeah, the storytelling sensibilities definitely skew younger than I'd like, but what a relief to see an original story with English dialogue that doesn't sound like it was spat out by a robot. And the art is very lush, none of the rushedness of the Boom! run of old.
ReplyDeleteThat panel of Scrooge teary-eyed reading the newspaper is actually quite moving. It really stood out to me, I guess because it displays genuine, subdued emotion, not just a cartoonish "boohoo!" Shame it's undercut by the joke about Scrooge caring more about the scones.
ReplyDeleteFeel there's something to say there about the ducks as dramatic vs. comedic characters. Sometimes Scrooge is a person, with his own emotions and personality; other times he's just a generic caricature of "rich guy" for the sake of whatever gag is convenient.
Well, he's not teary eyed, I suppose, just got a sad face. Guess I'm projecting more emotion on it than is really there.
DeleteIt's a good point, though. His portrayal can fluctuate pretty wildly from story to story.
DeleteFlawless command of morse is such a staple of old adventure stories its inclusion here doesn't really feel particularly off. Every adventurer or rando that ends up in some sort of danger is fluent in morse, there's almost always a random person in the area that spots it and can perfectly transcribe it, and every villain is usually too dumb to recognize it as obvious code if they see it.
ReplyDeleteBLINKING such a long message in morse must kill your eyes though.