Hi, welcome back! Normal service
resumes...now! Yeah, yeah, promises, promises. Still, this blog was
getting awfully lonely, and it was high time for a little discussion
of a teenage Don Rosa's unofficial Disney-comics debut, so here we
are (it should be noted that there's a credited co-writer for
this—anyone know who Ray Foushee is?). For a long time, this story
was kind of legendary; there were a few pages online, but the whole
thing—which has only ever been reprinted in some high-end
Scandinavian collection or other—was tantalizingly out of reach. I
first read it when a heroic poster name of Sigvald on the now-defunct Disney Comics Forum (Cacou? Olivier? Give us an update here!) just casually was all, oh,
yeah, I have scans of that, and started emailing them to everyone. I put it up on mediafire, and the rest is history. Really boring
history.
So what's the deal with this story?
Well, it is what it is, and what it is is a little joint by a couple
of smart-ass kids with senses of humor typical of smart-ass kids.
Certainly not as clever as it thinks it is, but by and large
charmingly juvenile, and interesting inasmuch as, satire or not, it's
easy to see Rosa's love of Carl Barks and even the odd preview of
what his work would later become. And the art isn't actually that bad; sure, it's a bit crude, but it more than does the job, and it becomes apparent that Rosa's facility with drawing ducks didn't just come out of nowhere with "Son of the Sun." Plus, you get to see Rosa drawings
of characters that he would never draw again. So let's look in,
shall we?
(Why are some of these images so dark?
I have no idea. The source images look normal. I had difficulty
editing these, for some reason.)
So, yes: the genre of humor known as
“seemingly wholesome kids' characters smoking pot” (“what if
instead of Harry Potter, it was Harry Pothead?!?):
hilarious to teenagers everywhere; for others of us...well, our
mileage may vary. Still, that little speech in the bottom left makes
it obvious that Rosa knows his Barks. They're really missing the
boat here, though: no, they didn't get much material reward out of
it, but all this globetrotting would easily make
them the Most Interesting Kids on Campus. You can't put a price on
that kind of social capital.
Okay, in order:
Goofy: “Poor old retard”...yeah,
ouch. Did I say “charmingly juvenile?” Well, yeah, but that
doesn't mean we can't cross over into “cringe-inducingly juvenile”
from time to time.
Daisy: I feel like we have here a
precursor to Daisy as she was portrayed in the alternate universe in
“The Duck Who Never Was.”
Grandma: Okay, to me, this is macabre
enough to be funny. Provides the most disturbing possible answer to
that old question “what's the difference in the duck universe
between anthropomorphic and non-anthroporphic animals?” Also,
who's that in the background? Why, it's Shamrock Bones!
A pretty obscure reference, even more so for a story that was
published in 1970.
Now we get to the other interesting
thing in the story, which is the relationship between Donald and
Scrooge. Interesting because, yeah, if you want, you can extrapolate
this from Barks' stories. But here's the thing: it's actually a
hell of a lot easier to extrapolate it from Rosa's
“canonical” stories. Satire it may be, but it also points pretty
clearly to Rosa's actual perspective on the relationship between the
two characters, somewhat less so with Donald (who's typically portrayed
more as dumb/hapless than anything else), but definitely
with Scrooge, who—I know I've belabored this point plenty in the
past—is all-too-often a gigantic flaming asshole in Rosa's work.
You can also see here the kind of
background details that he loved to put in his stories so.
ARGH WHY IS IT SO DARK?!? Looking up
explosives in the JW Guidebook? Funny. This kind of generalized
college revolutionary stuff definitely places the story, culturally
('course, naming the story in honor of Peyton Place doesn't hurt
either).
I dunno; I just wanted to show this
seminal picture of Gladstone's self-annihilation. Haven't we all
wanted to see something like this at one point or another?
Okay, this one just cracks me up by
virtue of being such a dopey pun. Rosa may not
care much about the non-duck characters, but this story shows that he
was perfectly aware of them. Can't say that rhyme
scans very well, though.
Yup. I guess it's a kind of obvious
joke, but still, Rosa drawing a Warner Brothers character: not
something you see every day. Or any day other than this, really.
Here, Donald learns a valuable lesson:
it's not about the money. Can't you see? It was never
about the money! It's all about the mindless violence!
Seriously, I somehow find this
conclusion highly satisfying. There are definitely times at the end
of Rosa stories where I've kinda felt that Scrooge had something like
this coming. And now, we get to enjoy it for real! Well, for
some definition of “real.”
Well, that's about that. It may not be
great art, but as li'l oddities in the past of a guy who would
continue on to much more substantial work go, it ain't too bad. Not
too bad at all. It is some extremely weak tea
that apparently Fantagraphics isn't going to include the whole thing
in their reprint series. Seriously, people, you people are building
this up to be way more than it is with this phobic
resistance to ever letting it officially see the light of day. You
need to be bigger, brighter, and bolder! Sorry, that was a reference
to the lame business English stuff I've been teaching. What the heck
is wrong with me?
According to Rosa's autobiography in the Scandinavian collection, Ray was a guy he met at St. Xavier High School in 1966. Also they happened to have been born at the same day at the same hospital too. And as Ray was a comic fan, they became good friends. Maybe more interesting is the story about another guy, Dick Reische, who had the originals for this story hidden away in 40 years. And Don Rosa's detective work to try to track him down. I don't have the Fantagraphics collection, but all this is probably written in the autobiography "The Life and Times of Don Rosa" printed in those books too.
ReplyDeleteInteresting stuff! Thanks for the info.
ReplyDeleteI found it ironic in the story that everything goes into such dark direction but Donalds attempts to murder Scrooge remain to be Looney Tunes slapsticky.
ReplyDeleteI also think the way Gladsone dies is precursor to concept of his luck working agianst him when the odds are on his side from "Oolated Luck" since the odds at Russian roulette are bigger to not get the bullet.
This "Oolated Luck" business is interesting, but I don't think Don Rosa thought this through when he created that panel. It's more like "Triple Distlefink": Gladstone becoming unlucky much to the reader's surprise.
ReplyDeleteVery good post anyway. Too bad about those dark pictures.
It's good to have you back Geo! This was a very interusting post but I was wondering ... When will we be able to hear your take on the new IDW stuff?
ReplyDeleteCan't help but notice Daffy is using Sylvester's catchphrase.
ReplyDeleteWell, it is mostly knows as Sylvester's, but Daffy used it on occasions.
ReplyDeleteGreat to have you back!
ReplyDeleteThis storyline is as dark as those pictures.
If ever there was an example of "loving satire", it is this. That second panel of the first scan in this post shows a level of familiarity and admiration for Barks' work far beyond what the casual fan could ever muster. And Donald's hatred for Scrooge and his inner monologue railing against Scrooge's mistreatment of him could easily be transplanted into many a "canonical" Rosa story and not be rendering incongruous by "canonical" Donald's actual behavior in any way.
ReplyDeleteNow, what actually *is* going on with the Disney Comics Forum????
Ray Foushee here.
ReplyDeleteI just stumbled across this page, and just had to say:
Every observation you've made about our (mostly my) juvenile script is 100%, absolutely correct. I'm mortified every time I see those pages. And lest Don be unjustly tarred, yes, I even have to lay claim to that (shudder) "retard" line.
But I still wouldn't trade having worked with Don on this (or the many other stupid stories we did as high school collaborators) for anything. We had a ball.
But yes -- this was jen-yoo-wine adolescent hubris in its starkest form, and you can believe it's painful for me to look back at from the ripe old age of 64.
By the way -- I sometimes still accompany Don to one or two of his American convention appearances every year, so if you ever see me, introduce yourself and I'll apologize personally.
Wow--how cool to see you pop up. No need for apologies; it's all good fun--though I certainly know from experience the mortification of looking at one's old writing! I'll be sure to say hi if I see you.
ReplyDeleteGeoX is right :) The only thing you deserve is a warm hand shake :)
ReplyDeleteIn some way it's actually nice time capsule since this way done decades before stuff like "South Park" or "Family Guy" so it's interesting to see this type of comedy being already used around. Makes me wonder where you guys inspired by "Fritz the Cat"...
Just seen (on Inducks of all sites) that Ray Foushee died :-(
ReplyDelete