The last installment in the epic trilogy!
...is definitely the wrong way to look at this story. "The Second-Richest Duck"/"The Money Champ" are a rare example of Barksian continuity; this and them really isn't, unless you consider the bare presence of Glomgold (bearing little resemblance to his past incarnations) to be all you need. For most intents and purposes, Flinty as he appears here could just be a random pigface villain for all the difference it would make.
We open with this somewhat weak gopher stuff; if anything, this story seems more like Barks deciding to go back and do some more riffing on "The Mines of King Solomon" than anything related to previous Glomgold stories.
BOY, though. I tell you what. This talk of gassing the gophers to death feels REALLY jarring and raises some VERY inappropriate associations. That's just not the kind of thing that tend to come up in Disney stories, and for good reason. I guess I'll choose to believe that we're talking about sleeping gas, and that the plan is just to relocate them outside.
Anyway, what's going on is this, which I just find confusing. Okay. So HDL's gopher calls got the gophers out of his lawn. But then...they summoned OTHER gophers, for some reason? Is "my lawn" here meant to be something different from "my back yard?" Someone explain!
It's just the period it was written in, but there is some rather odd character art here--just look at the nephews bottom right or Scrooge top left. It gives the story a slightly off-kilter feel.
And this "how us big wheels make big deals" thing is a kind of half-hearted theme throughout the story (cf "Pipeline to Danger"). Donald occasionally makes snide comments about how tycoons do or don't make deals...and that's about it. I don't think it's an insult to say that Barks wasn't working real hard on this one, and it's a tribute to his talent that it's nonetheless pretty good, overall.
It IS pretty funny, Scrooge eagerly making calculations and nearly crashing into the mountain. But what's this?!?
It's Feral Glomgold! He's definitely drawn in a more, let's say, bestial way than he was in his previous appearances, which suits his role here. Please disregard the fact that the colorist has, very distractingly, made him into a brunette. That's neither here nor there.
Boy, leaving HDL behind? Have you learned NOTHING from the many times they've saved your bacon? Well, clearly it just has to be that way because they need to save you AGAIN, and them being with you right now would interfere with that. But maybe you wouldn't have gotten into trouble in the first place if they'd been there to help! Ever think of THAT? Yeah, I thought not.
As for the natives, you know, they are what they are. I don't think there's much I can say about these depictions that I haven't said. I'm more interested in "they're on their way to the local Disneyland." So that's probably true--given the generally postmodern milieu of the story, if the locals said anything about what they were doing with the money, it would probably be something like that. But also, man--did Barks ever write anything else that nakedly metatextual? I'm down with it, for sure.
"Kraal." Presumably Barks got the word from one of his NatGeos; there's no way little kids would know it--but he stuck it in there anyway. That's what I call not talking down to your audience, and I love it. Also the racing lions, silly as the image may be.
Let's just chill and enjoy the art here. What else are you going to do? Those are some sweet hippos, I'll tell you that much.
Is this the closest Scrooge has ever come to his demise? Maybe!
Hey, remember that Strobl story I wrote about that also has "safari" in the title? And remember how HDL didn't understand the phrase "inaccessible plateau" from the Guidebook? Well, here we have another sort-of permutation on that: the information may be in the book, but the twist is, it was indexed by maniacs, so good luck finding it. It's funny: later on, the story is going to list the names of a number of animals that probably won't immediately be familiar to readers. They certainly weren't to me. But then you look them up and yup, really animal. The one exception is the lizard wizard bird, which, sadly, is not. Weird. And I don't even know what to say about "imagine a book that knows about such things as the lizard wizard!" Yeah...imagine that. Barks is clearly just being intentionally silly here, and god bless him for it.
I'm not sure if you can "buy" an indexing system, but Scrooge is certainly right that there's room for improvement here. Anyway, as I alluded to earlier, a lot of this is really just Barks vamping, but when you're this good at it, I am not going to complain.
Just some more of that, for fun. All this business of "recommending animals" is quite something. Very odd and interesting tone here.
It will be "continued" after an ad for Cheerios with Rocky and Bullwinkle, for the record. Great fun. Glomgold has a "snug mansion," at any rate. And say what you want about his portrayal here, but "the ducks shall make fine feasting for jackals" goes pretty hard.
...but also, you've gotta come up with something else. Repeating the "feast for jackals" thing kinda makes you look like a one-trick pony.
And anyway, these jackals look pretty adorable, so I wouldn't worry about it too much. It'll probably be fine.
How did you "miss" jackals in an alphabetical list? Tell me!
Give credit for this, I guess: unlike most Disney disguises, this one is actually fairly good, as long as his voice doesn't give him away.
See? There's not much to say about the "natives" here because it's just postmodern goofiness, with their organizational bureaucracy and all.
And we get a climax that may, again, make you think of "The Mines of King Solomon." Anything can indeed happen.
And yeah but so anyway, the ending is the only thing here that makes me think of the Glomgold of old. We do not find out who gets the mine, and we are not expected to care. Donald and HDL certainly don't. Now, part of this is less about Glomgold specifically and more about Barks being late in his career and not taking any of this terribly seriously. Still, I like to imagine that, in spite of not having depicted Glomgold in a particularly nuanced way this time around, there's still just something about that character that made him come back around to this thing where he and Scrooge are basically the same. You know, we occasionally see auctions like this that are seemingly poised to go on forever, and you wonder, how is this going to work? What specific cost is there that's acceptable, but that would make them balk if it were one shilling more? I feel like this wouldn't end until one of them literally loses consciousness from exhaustion.























Glomgold calling Scrooge and the nephews "the ducks" sounds off what with him being a duck himself. Perhaps this actually was written originally with someone like a pigface as the intended villain.
ReplyDeleteOr maybe Barks was trying to squeeze another layer out of Glomgold, even with the limited screen time he got, by suggesting that he's actually a self-loathing duck who tries to repress his own roots and culture. He hypocritically calls others “ducks” as an insult while refusing to face the reality of who he truly is. In that sense, he becomes a dark reflection of Scrooge, who struggled with his past, his poverty, his loneliness, and the compromises he'd made, YET gradually learned to acknowledge where he came from. His identity wasn't something he needed to escape, rather, it was an essential part of what made him who he was, both inside and out.
DeleteGlomgold, on the other hand, might be trying to escape his own origins by creating an exaggerated persona. Even his costume could be a hint at this, a way of constantly masking who he really is. He never truly came to terms with himself (not to mention his inner child). To him, being a “duck” means being weak, ordinary, and inferior, so he tries to place himself above other mallards. In a way, this kind of sad, inner conflict is what makes him more human. Aren't we all a little bit like Glomgold in that way?
Yes. If only tapes of Barks holding press conferences about his latest stories hadn't been lost to time, it's safe to bet this was 100% what he had in mind.
P.S.
His creepy, hunchbacked butler might be the only person we seen working at his Money Bin, which raises the possibility that he's actually a figment of Glomgold's imagination (like the bartender in Stanley Kubrick's "The Shining"), adding yet another layer to Glomgold's isolation and slow road to madness.
That's a good point. Very believable.
DeleteAnyway, what's going on is this, which I just find confusing. Okay. So HDL's gopher calls got the gophers out of his lawn. But then...they summoned OTHER gophers, for some reason? Is "my lawn" here meant to be something different from "my back yard?" Someone explain!
ReplyDeleteI think the idea is that Donald wanted to lure the gophers out of their burrows as a preliminary step to getting rid of them, and HDL's gopher-attracting whistle was meant to serve *that* purpose only to work a little too well.
I wonder if the animal riding sequence inspired Rosa's The Terror of the Transvaal. Notable that in that story it's kind of framed as Scrooge being exceptionally badass, whereas here it's just wacky hijinks that the entire Duck family can get in on.
ReplyDeleteThat, too, is a good point. Shoulda thought of that.
DeleteThis is one of Barks’ rougher stories, art wise. While there are some really good panels (mostly with the jungle animals), the ducks themselves look pretty sketchy and some of the secondary characters look pretty weird. Barks has blamed some of this on the cheap quality paper that Western Publishing prodded him with, saying that the pencil and pen would dig into the paper, affecting the flow of his art.
ReplyDeleteYou’re right, though, this story could have just as well had some generic villain instead of Glomgold, although I suspect that Glomgold’s ruthlessness in this story inspired the writers of the 1987 DuckTales, where Glomgold would throw around explosives to stack the deck in competitions with Scrooge. (The 2017 Glomgold was a total idiot, kind of like Daffy Duck from The Looney Tunes Show, but a villain).
The thing with DuckTales 2017 Glomgold is that the writers were trying to follow the pattern of many Disney Channel cartoon villains at the time, like Dr. Doofenshmirtz from Phineas and Ferb or a number of Kim Possible villains: an evil mastermind who's funny in a self-aware, “I know all the villain clichés and have to point them out every single time to show how meta and modern the show is, here, let me show you my new -inator!” kind of way.
DeleteTo me, it felt less like the writers were disrespecting the character and more like they were simply used to that particular comedic style when writing amusing bad guys.
For what it's worth, Keith Ferguson, who voiced Glomgold, did a great job with the material. The way he would scream certain words was genuinely hilarious and made me forgive a lot more than I probably should have on paper. It's just not the Glomgold I would have liked to see.
Also, for one of Scrooge's arch-enemies, I wish he had been portrayed as more of a genuine threat more often. There was an okay balance in the pilot, but things quickly got Flanderized. He went from what should have been Scrooge's Lex Luthor to Scrooge's Wile E. Coyote.
That said, I actually think the idea for the origin story episode they gave him in season 2 was better than what Rosa did.
That should say “provided”, not “prodded”. Stupid autocomplete.
ReplyDelete