"Donald's Pet Service"
So, no joke: I actually was planning on writing this entry--I had the panels to use all chosen and everything--when friend-of-the-blog Debbie Anne posted a panel from it on facebook, and said that she didn't remember the story itself. So, that gave me an incentive to get it done.
The story here is pretty standard
stuff: Donald starts this new enterprise that provides opportunities
for misadventures to occur. And then...they do. But it's Barks, so
you can be pretty sure it'll be worth reading anyway.
As we like to do, let's take a survey
of the art in Donald's house. First, that odd thing in the upper
right of the first panel, that looks like it might be some kind of photo negative. Are those minarets? Is this a cityscape from some Islamic
country? Or are they just smokestacks? Interesting choice in any
event. And then let's not overlook the other picture, with its
unsettling cluster of duck heads that may or may not be silently
passing judgment on the characters. Sometimes I feel like the Duck
house would be a creepy place to live.
Finally, note that this originally
appeared in WDC 200. Barks celebrated the occasion by doing...the
usual thing. And why not? I don't know what that 575 next to the
200 in the bottom of the last panel signifies.
We begin, as well we should, with the
most "normal" item on the list, A Large Dog. THIRTY POUNDS
OF DOG FOOD. For that, I'm expecting some sort of Clifford-esque
monstrosity.
Yup, it's a pretty big dog. BUUUUT...for
comparison purposes, my parents have two dogs. They're nothing like
the one here, but they're large-ish beasts. Maybe half the size of
this unnamed (unless "Puppy" is meant to be its name)
animal. And they each get three cups of dog food a day (plus
miscellaneous biscuits). Whereas, if the internet can be trusted,
thirty pounds would be about sixty cups. You
thought you'd get away with this flagrant error, Barks?!? Not while
I'm on the case!
Anyway, the main thing Louie suffers
here (yes, it's Louie; as you know, the hat colors had not been
standardized at this time) is a log falling on him. He really
shouldn't complain. It seems like pretty minor stuff in the long or
short or medium run.
Next one is these Hummingbirds of Doom.
I've long had this idea for a horror movie where woodpeckers develop
a taste for HUMAN BRAINS and start pecking on people's heads instead
of wood. So, you know. Okay, it's silly, but I feel this is sillier
still; hummingbirds are such fragile little creatures that this idea
comes off as even goofier. Sad to say, I think the real-world result
of this ZOW behavior would be...all of them collapsing, dead. Not a
very edifying conclusion for the episode, admittedly.
And for this one, of course, there's no
danger at all, just annoyance. But man, what annoyance. Because, I
mean, if there are flies there are flies, but often there simply
AREN'T, and then what do you do? Maybe these people maintain a
fly-heavy environment, but in that case you'd expect him to be able to find more.
"Who, I suspect, is a horse."
There's that odd Barks diction popping up again. This is one thing
about Barks that no one would imitate, but you see it all the time.
Is it part of his inimitable charm, or is he great in spite of it?
Difficult to say.
...but I do have to say, that bottom
right panel is one of Donald's most dickish moments. The kid just
saved you shitloads of work; you could at least display a
little gratitude? Maybe?
"Who, no doubt, is a cat."
There it is again! The sort of thing you'd see more often in writing
than you would in speech. Is there some cultural reason that I don't
get why you'd automatically assume that "Annie" would be a
cat's name?
You know...when I was in Borneo
(god, this makes me sound so much more
cosmopolitan than I actually am), we went on a night hike in the
jungle, and we came across some fire ants doing their thing--marching en
masse across the path--and the guide hurried us by, because it
would've been possibly dangerous and certainly unpleasant to get up close and personal with them. But Barks
seems to have this idea that all kinds of ants
will fuck your shit up--see the earlier story now known as "Donald
Duck Rants About Ants." They're not that dangerous, dude! Or
dangerous at all.
...and, I mean, if the only problem is
that they tickle... really, now. What would it be
like to have an anteater as a pet? Well, it's probably
not a good idea, as these things so rarely are. This gal's
kinda cute, though, I suppose.
Now we get to the somewhat terrifying
part. That is some ominous foreshadowing right there.
Yay! This image is cool, yet kind of
alarming. I like. But--I mean, I don't want to get too graphic
here, but it's hard not to--if they're being fed whole friggin'
goats, isn't the pool going to quickly become a horrific mess of
blood and bone fragments? Well, I guess maybe not if they're
prepared properly. But I still can't help but think that it would need VERY regular cleaning.
For no particular reason, here we have
two nephews being clumsy. It does kind of crack me up.
Well, in fairness, now that you know
what you're up against, it shouldn't be as bad. You can prepare for
at least some of the stuff, and as long as you're careful, most of
the animals shouldn't be a problem. But granted, Donald is surely
the Most Dangerous Game here. Gripe! Gripe! Gripe! indeed.
Labels: Carl Barks
8 Comments:
If what an old issue of ZooBooks once told me is correct, hummingbirds are actually pretty aggressive little creatures who will occasionally gang up on larger birds if they find their presence offensive. We tend to think of them as harmless because of their size and diet, but honestly, I don't find the whole feeder situation here to be all that far-fetched. Comedically exaggerated and unlikely, to be sure, but I could see it happening in some form.
I must agree with Psycopathicus. What sort of odd double-standard is it that we acknowledge that a swarm of hornets can be a menace, yet hummingbirds, who are noticeably larger, should get a free pass? Granted, hummingbirds are cute, but so are honeybees until they start stinging.
Various thoughts:
"Who, no doubt, is a cat." There it is again! The sort of thing you'd see more often in writing than you would in speech.
You're probably right (I mean, I could say things like that orally, but I'm a dreadfully theatrical person). But Donald isn't speaking: those are his thoughts. And even though they're written like lines, people don't normally think as a coherent internal monologue; rendering characters' thoughts into words is always artificial and doesn't actually reflect what they're thinking word for word. So while you're at it you might as well do it with some flair.
(god, this makes me sound so much more cosmopolitan than I actually am)
Well if you're worried about appearing too cosmopolitan, perhaps you oughtn't have your username be “Rootless Cosmopolitan GeoX”, if I may. Heheh.
-if they're being fed whole friggin' goats, isn't the pool going to quickly become a horrific mess of blood and bone fragments?
Not if those are cartoon fish who swallow the goats whole, as I'd assume they would be. They sure don't look like real sharks and lampreys to me. Do real sharks even have tongues to lick their chops with?…
On the prevalence of flies: an old house like that depicted might well have been devoid of window screens in the 1950's, by which time they had become common in newer houses.
Also, in gender solidarity I feel the need to point out that INDUCKS attributes the story idea to Carl's daughter Peggy.
The anteater link doesn't work for me....
As a European, I still can't get over the fact that you Americans have screens on your windows as a matter of course. It's one of those weird cultural differences where you don't even consider there might be a difference until someday in your late teens or twenties you learn about it by chance and boggle.
Seeing this helped jog my memory on this story. I remember the parts with the hummingbirds and the nephew playing fetch with the dog upon seeing them again. By this time, Barks' ten-pagers had begun to get pretty formulaic, so something like this one could fall through the cracks because it doesn't stand out as much as his late 40's-early 50's stories. Thank you for running this. I don't think this one is in one of the currently available Fantagraphics Carl Barks books, or if it is, I have fallen behind on reading them (and Don Rosa's library) between the last few Floyd Gottfredson books and the Disney Masters volumes.
Oops! I just checked my shelves, and this story is in Fantagraphics’ “Donald Duck: The Lost Peg-Leg Mine”! Guess what I’ll be reading tonight?
Speaking of Fantagrphics, I would love to hear GeoX take on "The The Ghost Sheriff of Last Gasp"... I find the entire premise of this one very disturbing and almost non-Barksian in how much Suspension of disbelief it expects from the reader... despite a great, great setup.
If you’re looking for comprehensive pet care advice, A Pet Parents Guide to Caring offers valuable insights that I found extremely helpful for my furry friend.
A Pet Parents Guide
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home