"The Fountain of Strength"
Well, we recently learned from Mark
Evanier that Vic Lockman had died on June 1 of this year, at the age of
ninety. I felt that I should write something in...I dunno. Tribute?
Recognition? Acknowledgement?
The thing is, Lockman seems like such
an odd figure to me. He was an extremely prolific writer for
Western; I'd say that outside of Barks (who was working on a
completely different level and probably isn't really a valid
comparison), he did more (for better or worse) to define their body
of work than any other single person (Paul Murry and Tony Strobl
probably come close). He definitely had a hell of a work ethic. And
yet, he sure isn't widely known or acknowledged (the fact that we've
only learned of his passing almost seven months after the fact is
indicative of something), and you can see little
if any of his influence in any subsequent comics (though let's give a
shout-out to our friend Joe Torcivia, who is a big
fan and whose own localized scripts bear an acknowledged Lockmanian
influence). To give him his due, he IS one of the very few
post-Barks cartoonists to have created characters who endured and
were used by creators after him. That's an accomplishment however
you cut it, but I think we could fairly describe the impact of Moby
Duck and Emil Eagle as modest. He remains little
remembered and held in little affection. Or such is my perception.
Two probable reasons for this: reason
the first is that his work is also kind of inextricably associated
with Western's long, slow slide into mediocrity and worse.
Associations do not tend to be positive, to the extent that people
make them. And reason the second...well, look, I'm not trying to
smear the man, but I don't think it's really possible to talk about
him in an honest way without at least acknowledging his, ah,
interesting political and religious views, and I
really do think they explain a lot. I mean, I don't want to dwell on
this; you can pretty quickly figure out exactly where he stood by
looking at his website. In fairness, these mostly didn't come out in
his Disney work (mostly),
but they've somewhat overshadowed said work. If he had just retired
and not made a second career for himself
self-publishing crankish tracts, I think he'd have a much less
problematic reputation (I mean, as Disney comic writers go--it's all
relative). But I'm not trying to argue that his general low profile
in the Disney world is because he had fringe
beliefs. Rather: I'm arguing that it sure looks like he actually
wanted his Disney work to be overshadowed. As far
as I know, he never gave any post-retirement interviews on the
subject, and his official
website breathes barely a word about what he spent the bulk
of his career doing (it's vaguely alluded to if you click on "drawing
books," but that seems to be it). Also, there's this odd bit
from Evanier's obituary:
I called to sound him out as a
potential recipient of the Bill Finger Award for Excellence in Comic
Book Writing, which I administer and which goes to writers who have
not received sufficient recognition and/or reward. Since Lockman
certainly qualifies for lack of recognition, I wanted to see if he'd
consider accepting it should the judging committee select him some
year. I am not sure I completely understood his response but it was
unmistakably negative about the award and the whole concept of
celebrating comic books that do not celebrate God's covenants.
I know I'm just speculating here, but I
get the impression that he may have in retrospect conceived his
Disney work as taking away from what he felt he should really
be telling the world about, and what he really wanted to be known
for. Which is kind of a shame, because as...not that great...as a
lot of his Disney comics are, they're a much
better legacy than "evolution demolished in this exciting novel!
Harry Potter, 'Goodbye!" Bible Kids, 'hi!'" I mean,
really. Some of his scripts were drawn by Barks
himself, fercrissake! That's something anyone
should be proud of! But the thing is--I think--he considered his
most important work the post-Disney stuff, and it's not easy to think
of him without thinking of it and feeling kind of ambivalent.
There's just no getting around it.
Still. I felt I should write something
in commemoration. The problem is, in all honesty, it's a bit
difficult for me to find stories for him that I unequivocally like.
They exist, and you can click on the "Vic Lockman" tag on
this post to see a fair variety of stuff he did that I've written
about--both high points and low. But look, if we're talking about
him, we should talk about him, warts'n'all. So HERE we have this 1968 story PERSONALLY RECOMMENDED by David Gerstein for your
delectation. I mean, recommended for me to write about; not
necessarily recommended for you to read. So if you do and you don't
like it, you have only yourself to blame. Cha! This is from the
Beagle Boys line, one of those spin-off comic
books that I can barely believe were successful enough to be as
financially viable as they apparently were. This one was irregularly
published for FIFTEEN YEARS, with an additional year as The
Beagle Boys versus Uncle Scrooge. Can you imagine? I'll
try to be mostly positive about this story--there ARE things to
like--but a man has his limits, so we'll have to see what we see.
Well, right out of the gate, we have
this opening, which I find unironically funny. I don't know if it
was Lockman's intent, quite, but the sheer idiocy
of the Beagles just firing indiscriminately at the darkness is just
hilariously stupid to me. Yay!
Well...yup, it's the Beagle Brats. If
they're anyone's favorite characters, I'd sure like to meet that
person. No I wouldn't. Did Lockman actually create
them? Hard to say--inducks isn't willing to hazard an opinion about
their
first appearance; I'd bet it's him, but
the dialogue isn't distinctive enough for a hundred-percent match.
Really, as much as I don't like the concept, I guess it was somewhat inevitable. It's the Disney Law: EVERY goddamn character needs, at some point, to have either nephews or nieces depending on their gender, and this applies to villains as well: Magica has nieces; Glomgold, Rockerduck, and Pete have nephews...has the Phantom Blot ever had a nephew or two? He's gotta have had, doesn't he? Dorfman and Mattelart will tell you it's because the Disneyverse has been drained of all generative power, trapping everyone and everything in an endless now. Maybe so! That's neither here nor there.
Point is, as much as I'm not a fan, the
Beagle Brats could be worse in this story. But it
does make ya wonder, even more than you normally do: just who
the heck are these kids' parents? Do the Beagles have
law-abiding siblings whose kids have betrayed them? Or what? Hmm.
Also, do all the Beagles have the same birthday? Are these three
just triplets? Or what?
Lockman was into goofy wordplay like
you see here: "spin-the-stool-pigeon," "bum rap."
It's not as pronounced here as it is in some of his stories, but you
can still see it. It's okay, I guess. At any rate, it adds interest
to otherwise pedestrian plots.
Well, at least the search is motivated,
kind of. 'Cause they feel they're getting old and weak 'cause they
can't keep up with their nephews, you see. There's an extremely
interesting existential tale of existential fear of aging buried
somewhere in here, though obviously it was never gonna come out. I
mean, not in anyones' hands, probably, and
certainly not in Lockman's.
Meet Cousin Tic-Tac-Toe, a character
who for some reason is inducksed despite only appearing in this one story. Lockman was hella
into gimmicks (part of the reason why I think he invented the Beagle
Brats); this Beagle with a tic tac toe board on his shirt is one
example. I actually like him, kinda. Dig that roguish grin. He
seems like a fun guy. And I like the way he insists on taking
the exact route, as opposed to, I dunno, walking
around all the houses and barns that have cropped
up en route, even though it makes zero sense to do so.
See? He's aging faster with
every step he takes! Time's winged chariot hurrying near
&c.
And so, Cousin TTT cheerily exits the
story and the Disneyverse. I really like how he just straight-up
does not care what difficulties the Beagles may
have run into; you just pay him and he fucks right off. Farewell,
Cousin TTT! We'll not see the likes of you again!
Here's another Cousin! He likes
explosives and his number plate is a countdown. That's all. This
fine fellow has appeared in two separate stories.
Why couldn't that be TTT? I like him more.
Look, it turns out that fountain's
actually out of town. Science, okay? Or possibly because Lockman wanted to shoehorn Grandma into the proceedings. Either way, JUST ACCEPT IT. SO, here's
ol' Zeke Wolf, whose name Lockman may or may not know! This is just
a cameo, but it shows another aspect of Lockman's general penchant
for gimmickry: his love of weird crossovers. An example most people
will know--because it was drawn by Barks--is the one with Dumbo on
Grandma's farm.
Anyway, here, Zeke literally gets his
ass kicked by a cheerful chicken. I think that's a lot of fun.
And, I mean, in general, animals who've
drunk from the magic pond kicking the shit out of everyone is good
for a laff or two.
"The prison farm." Where
Grandma just sort of loiters around and gloats, apparently.
...if she knows that
she has a pond of magic water, shouldn't she do something with it
beyond making the Beagles into more efficient slave labor? I realize
that's a question that was pointless to ask and that no one can
answer, but really now.
...and so, the Beagles are forced to
work like beasts of burden by the cackling, inbred wardens. But at
any rate, the Brats are back, to give the story a sort-of symmetry!
Hurrah!
Welp, love him or hate him, that's
Lockman, and this is a generally above-average example of his work. Whaddaya rate the chances of this being redrawn by Daan Jippes? Actually, if nothing else it would be kind of interesting to see what he could do with a few of these middling Late-Western things. I may write about a few more of Lockman's stories in the coming days, so if
you have any favorites, let me know.
Labels: Pete Alvarado, Vic Lockman
11 Comments:
Geo:
It’s always been my belief that Vic Lockman created the Beagle Brats! Once April, May, and June were established (and Lockman used them FAR MORE than Barks ever did), he apparently set out to have “Junior Member” analogues to the entire cast – like “Newton Gearloose”.
The Phantom Blot had “The Phantom Brat”, though not created by Lockman!
Needless to say, this is a major loss to me as Vic Lockman’s body of work, with all its unique quirks, has been such a large influence on my own comics work. I’m presently working on my own “tribute post”, which will appear after the New Year has been rung-in, because of a backlog of holiday related posts that are in the midst of being published.
Lots of Lockman goodies will be found there, with highlighted stories both good and bad! More good than bad, because I don’t think most folks really know the “good”, because the “bad” stands-out so! Naturally, I link to your classic post on “Bird Bothered Hero” – the single worst Disney comic ever created in terms of poor story, bad art, and unattractive lettering!
I also discuss and illustrate what I consider to be “The Ultimate Vic Lockman Story”! You’ll just have to drop by in early January to find out what that might be!
Finally, let’s not forget that, for just about everyone who toiled in comics prior to the 1970s… IT WAS JUST A JOB! That seems unthinkable in this age of nothing but fandom-spawned creators – not the least of which are what I call “The IDW Creative Core Four”: David Gerstein, Jonathan Gray, Thad Komorowski, and myself!
We savor and appreciate every moment spent in furthering the legacy of “giants” like Carl Barks, Floyd Gottfredson, or Romano Scarpa. But, to the generation of which I speak, they were not “heroes”, just co-workers or contemporaries. Most of these folks did what they did for the paycheck – and, not surprisingly, Vic Lockman would seem to be one of them.
Though, despite such views (and the “other views” of which you write), I’ll offer Vic Lockman a hearty “Yay for you!”
Lockman stories I actually like (we'll see if these turn up on Joe's list):
(1) The Hound of Basketville--because I remember it fondly from early childhood as the first story which showed me what a literary parody is. In a nice completion of that arc, the first story that showed my Disney-comics-loving godson what a literary parody is was the Simpsons' comics parody of Uncle Scrooge!
(2) The Dime from Uncle--starring Witch Hazel, here called Wanda Witch, presumably because everyone and their cousin had a character named "Witch Hazel", including the prominent character in the Little Lulu comics. This one was championed by our friend "Scrooge MacDuck" on Feathery Society, who wrote: "Vic Lockman sucked at doing serious Barksian plots, but when he could just write whatever crossed his mind thanks to a plot device like witchcraft, the results could be hilarious hilarious." I agree that this story has delightfully silly and funny stuff in it, and a female character with agency who gets her happy ending, to boot!
My favorite moments: tied-up Scrooge, sneaking off to dial a phone *with his beak*, saying "There's no use calling the police! They are helpless against black magic! I'm going to call the Junior Woodchucks!" By which he means, he's calling the phone in Huey, Dewey and Louie's bedroom and waking them up in the middle of the night! Who you gonna call...? And on the next page, a Beagle says, "Cease fire, everybody! Let's let Scrooge have the floor!" leading Wanda to say to Scrooge: "Make it snappy! I was winning!"
Elaine:
Those are indeed great stories but, since my post is WAAAAY long as it is, they are not included.
…Oh, wait until you see what I believe is “The Ultimate Vic Lockman Story”! I’ve reproduced it in its entirety, so that you might all experience it! I so enjoyed reading it again tonight for the Blog post! Hint: It’s not a Disney story, so don’t go scouring Inducks!
I’m aiming the post for January 03, 2018, with a “New Year’s” post coming first.
…has the Phantom Blot ever had a nephew or two?
I see Joe already mentioned the Phantom Brat, but she's a special case, since she's his daughter. The Blot had more traditional nephews in the form of the Three Blotlings, documented here on the Scrooge McDuck Wiki:
http://scrooge-mcduck.wikia.com/wiki/Three_Blotlings
I don't think I'll ever be interested enough to really "get into" Lockman´s Disney work- most of these comics are just so dull looking and, in my experience, if you actually read them it only gets worse... unless you stumble on the occasional nugget of weirdness, which can make it interesting for a minute. But I could be wrong! Maybe the (comparatively) few stories I read were just among his lesser work...
I forgot these Christian comics Lockman did later in life- and that he was actually a pretty capable artist! I think a lot of this stuff is pretty fun to look at (as far as I can tell, his homepage doesn´t provide the best pictures) and much more lively than many Disney comics from the time he worked on them... Sure, his work certainly seems to be on the more wacky side of religiousness and a lot of it looks kinda strange with everyone being just a little too happy and even the sun and the trees smiling a little too much... as if it could go into Al Columbia-esque horror-territory at any minute! But I feel like he put a lot of dedication into these drawings and it shows. "Link Lizard defeats evolution" is probably pretty wacky (what an assumption!), but it doesn´t look dull ;)
The topic of older cartoonists starting a second (or third, or fourth...) career in self published, ideology-based material seems interesting to me, although on first thought Steve Ditko is the only other one I could name... but I feel like there are more.
Some of of Lockman/Strobl's post-Barks WDC 10-pagers are actually very good. My favorite is probably "The Pride of Duckburg".
https://inducks.org/story.php?c=W+WDC+323-01
You inspired me to read the story in question, and you're right; it's very good. The only thing is, there's really nothing in it to me that screams--or even just states in a normal tone of voice--"Lockman." Are we one hundred percent sure it's him? I mean, it could be; I'm no expert. I just wonder how definitive inducks' judgment is.
...actually, I guess that distinction between automation and craftsmanship does seem a BIT Lockmanesque, maybe...
I’m not about to say Vic Lockman didn’t write “The Pride of Duckburg”, because I’m not sure anyone around today could prove yea or nay. But, if you ask me, I’d be more inclined to attribute the story to Bob Gregory.
The sad thing is we'll never really know because, before a certain time, all publishers didn’t think anyone would ever care enough about their creators – and the lasting impression they would make upon the readership!
On the other hand, I note as I'm putting my WDC&S # 323 back in its storage box, Vic Lockman very definitely wrote the Donald Duck lead story in the following issue, # 324, "The Clock Plot"!
Read these two back-to-back and you may be of the opinion that "The Pride of Duckburg" and "The Clock Plot" are the product of two different writers.
Meh. Most of Vic Lockman's stories didn't do Donald justice in terms of what he's capable of. He's much stronger than Gyro and yet supposedly Lockman thinks Gyro is "not as puny?!" Ridiculous...
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home